Skip to main content

Free Will

The Illusion of Free Will 

Free will is an illusion. I will try to explain why I believe this is the case using a scientific and a philosophical argument. I want to first clarify what I mean by "Free Will." I think that free will can be defined quite simply as the ability to have acted differently. In other words, if you could go back in time at any point in your life you have the ability to have made a different choice. This is demonstrably false.

Scientific Case against Free Will

One of the strongest cases against free will have been studies done by neuroscience to study our decision making process. A study done in 2008 showed that researchers could tell what decision a participant would take up to 10 seconds before they became aware of their decision. This and other studies have put into question the idea that we are the authors of our own actions. It seems to me at this point one fact is indisputable, some moments before we are aware of what we'll do next, our brains have already determined what we will do. It is only later that we become aware of the process of having made a "decisions." Sam Harris says it best in his book Free Will:
Consider what it would take to actually have free will. You would need to be aware of all the factors that determine your thoughts and actions, and you would need to have a complete control over those factors. But there is a paradox here that vitiates the very notion of freedom - for what would influence the influences? More influences? None of these adventitious mental states are the real you. You are not controlling the storm, and you are not lost in it. You are the storm.

 Philosophical Case against Free Will

Following Harris's logic indeed in order to have free will we would necessary need to be aware of and have control of everything that determines our choices: environmental factors, our current moods, other people, past experiences and much more. This is simply not possible. Think about a movie. Why did you choose that movie? Why did you not choose The Avengers or Harry Potter. Did you have any control on why you chose that movie? Could you have chosen to want to to choose another movie? Of course not, not any more than you can choose to like one song over another or choose to like chocolate over vanilla ice cream. 

Everything that you think and do arises from prior causes in which you have no control over. You did not choose your parents, your genes, where you were born and your upbringing. Most of these come down to luck. Where is the free will in that?

Your choices still matter


Free will is an illusion but it is indeed a very useful one. Dispelling with the notion of free will need not make you fatalistic. Actions will still have consequences, and what you "choose" to do will still matter to your personal life. You just don't have control over what you "want" to do. And do you ever really do anything on purpose that you don't want to do? Excluding being forced to of course. If what you've read has convinced you that free will is an illusion, you had no choice in the matter. If you remain unconvinced, again you had no choice in the matter. Freedom never entered into it.

Knowledge still matters. David Deutsch says that everything, not forbidden by the laws of physics, is possible as long as you have the right knowledge. With or without free will beliefs will always have consequences and knowledge helps us make better choices. 


Sources:

  Harris S, 2012. Free Will: https://samharris.org/books/free-will/ 
  Surviving The Cosmos - Waking Up with Sam Harris and David Deutsch
  Bode S, He AH, Soon CS, Trampel R, Turner R, Haynes J-D. Tracking the Unconscious Generation of Free Decisions Using UItra-High Field fMRI. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Firmware Upgrade for the Mind

Q: 

What Book is so special to you that you feel immediately closer to someone when they mention how important it is to them?

This question was asked on Twitter, and I surprised myself in how quickly an answer came to mind (though I cheated and mentioned 2) because whenever people ask what are your favorite books I find it tough to answer. I have enjoyed so many that I'd be hard-pressed to just list 10. Despite this fact, I have found that although many books have taught me valuable lessons, none have completely changed the way I view things as much as Lying by Sam Harris and The Beginning of Infinity by David Deutsch. More importantly than how I view things, these two books have changed how I act too. Using Sam's terminology, these two books were a firmware upgrade for my mind. I will be posting more on David's book, there is much to unpack and it is the best book I have ever read, for now, this post will focus on Sam's book.


Is it Ever Okay to Lie? A lie according to…

Why Critical Discussion is Difficult

A short passage: 


The Myth of the Framework by Karl Popper (bold emphasis mine.)
Truth is hard to come by. It needs both ingenuity in criticizing old theories, and ingenuity in the imaginative invention of new theories. This is so not only in the sciences, but in all fields.
Serious critical discussions are always difficult. Non-rational human elements such as personal problems always enter. Many participants in a rational, that is, a critical, discussion find it particularly difficult that they have to unlearn what their instincts seem to teach them (and what they are taught, incidentally, by every debating society): that is, to win. For what they have to learn is that victory in a debate is nothing, while even the slightest clarification of one’s problem – even the smallest contribution made towards a clearer understanding of one’s own position or that of one’s opponent – is a great success. A discussion which you win but which fails to help you to change or to clarify your mind at l…